Does online therapy work for children and young people
When the pandemic pushed mental health services online in 2020, many clinicians were sceptical about whether remote therapy could be effective with children and young people. Several years of evidence later, the picture is more nuanced and more positive than many expected.
What the research shows
Multiple systematic reviews have now examined the effectiveness of online and video-based therapy for children and adolescents. The evidence is strongest for CBT delivered via video for anxiety disorders, where outcomes are broadly comparable with face-to-face delivery. A 2022 review published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry found that internet-delivered and videoconference-delivered interventions produced significant reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms in young people, with effect sizes similar to in-person treatment. The evidence is less developed for younger children, complex presentations, and relational therapies that depend heavily on nonverbal communication, but for the majority of presentations treated in private CAMHS settings, online delivery is clinically sound.
Why many young people prefer it
Teenagers in particular often engage more readily with online therapy than face-to-face. The reasons are consistent across clinical observation and research. Being in a familiar environment reduces the intimidation of a clinical setting. Some teenagers find eye contact and physical presence during difficult conversations overwhelming, and the screen creates a manageable distance. Reduction in travel logistics removes a practical barrier to attendance. There is also evidence that young people with social anxiety, one of the most prevalent presentations in adolescent mental health, engage particularly well with video-based therapy. The reduced social exposure can allow them to begin therapeutic work that they would struggle to initiate in person.
The practical advantages
Online delivery removes significant practical barriers to accessing mental health care. Children and young people in rural or semi-rural areas face genuine access challenges: a round trip to a clinic in a city takes time out of the school day, creates travel costs, and may require a parent to take time off work. Online delivery means that a child in rural Scotland can access the same consultant psychiatrist or psychologist as a child in central London. For families managing complex schedules, online appointments also offer flexibility that makes sustained engagement with treatment more realistic.
When in-person is preferable
Online delivery is not appropriate for all situations. Initial assessments for complex presentations often benefit from in-person observation. Some therapeutic approaches, particularly those involving young children or using creative and play-based methods, work better face-to-face. And where there is active risk, an in-person clinical relationship provides important safeguards. A good provider will be clear about when online delivery is appropriate and when it is not.
What good online therapy looks like
The modality of delivery matters less than the quality of the clinician. Good online therapy for young people should involve a clinician who is trained and registered with the relevant professional body, a clear treatment plan with defined goals, regular review, and the same standards of clinical note-keeping and safeguarding that apply to face-to-face work.
If you would like to find out whether online therapy at Blip is the right fit for your child, you can begin an enquiry using the link below.
Common questions
Is online therapy actually effective for children and young people?
The evidence is strongest for CBT delivered via video for anxiety disorders, where outcomes are broadly comparable with face-to-face delivery. A 2022 review in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry found that internet-delivered and videoconference-delivered interventions produced significant reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms in young people, with effect sizes similar to in-person treatment. The evidence is less developed for younger children, complex presentations, and relational therapies that depend heavily on nonverbal communication.
Why do some teenagers prefer online therapy to face-to-face sessions?
Being in a familiar environment reduces the intimidation of a clinical setting, and some teenagers find eye contact and physical presence during difficult conversations overwhelming, so the screen creates a manageable distance. Removing travel logistics also removes a practical barrier to attendance. There is evidence that young people with social anxiety, one of the most prevalent presentations in adolescent mental health, engage particularly well with video-based therapy, since the reduced social exposure lets them begin work they would struggle to start in person.
When is in-person treatment better than online for a child?
Initial assessments for complex presentations often benefit from in-person observation, and some therapeutic approaches, particularly those involving young children or using creative and play-based methods, work better face-to-face. Where there is active risk, an in-person clinical relationship provides important safeguards. A good provider should be clear about when online delivery is appropriate and when it is not, rather than defaulting to remote sessions regardless of presentation.
If you have concerns about your child, the easiest place to start is a free call with a clinician.
Book a free 20‑minute callNot sure we are the right fit? Answer four quick questions, or begin an enquiry.
Related reading
You might also find these helpful
The Fonagy review: what it means for your child
The independent review into mental health conditions, ADHD and autism reported on 9th October. It found the rise in distress among young people is real, that ADHD and autism are being diagnosed far more often without becoming more common, and that help should stop depending on a diagnosis. Here is what that means for families in England and in Wales.
Right to Choose for ADHD: what the new waits mean
Four NHS areas in England now set a minimum wait before a Right to Choose ADHD or autism assessment can start, two years in West Yorkshire. Here is what that means for families in England and in Wales, and the support that can start before any diagnosis.
One in five children now have a mental health disorder
A new report puts a number on something parents, teachers and GPs already sense: the proportion of children with a probable mental health disorder has grown sharply in just three years. What matters is what that number changes about when to act.